During the middle period of the nineteenth century military engineers
were at odds as to whether it was appropriate to fortify an extended position
with field works closed at the gorge. In the event that a detached work in
line of entrenchments was captured a work open at the gorge would be more
difficult for the attacking force to hold against a counter attack and its
interior would be exposed to artillery and small arms fire from other works
to its rear. An enclosed work with a parapet covering its rear, on the other
hand would be much easier for an attacker to defend and use to continue his
attack against the line, it would certainly be much more difficult for counter
attacking troops to re-take. But, if well defended by a determined garrison
an enclosed work could not be turned by an attack directed against its gorge
and its defenders could persist in their defense even after attacking troops
filled the intervals between works. Both solutions were used during the American
Civil War and both pretty much held to expected consequences.
This redoubt and redan line with intervals, taken from D. H. Mahan's
Treatise on Field Fortification, combined a front line of square redoubts
with a second line of redans. |