Dictionary of Fortification

Head-logs and Other Protection Above the Interior Crest

As an attacking body of troops advanced within easy musket range of a field work the defenders crouching down on the banquette tread under cover of the parapet or along the bottom of a trench suddenly popped up in unison to deliver a crushing volley before continuing to fire by file. Popping up meant, of course, that the defenders had to raise their heads and shoulders above the level the interior crest of the parapet. A well arranged attack took advantage of this exposure by including specially detailed firing parties composed of particularly adapt marksmen whose object was to reduce opposition to the advance of the storming party by picking the defenders off as they popped up or stood upright in one place to re-load and fire again. Given a sufficiently strong and talented firing party, the defenders would eventually be discouraged from poking their Adapted From Lendy, Elements of Fortification (1857) P. 19heads up above the interior crest. If this happened and the defenders' musket fire was suppressed, the attacking troops' working parties could dismantle obstacles so that the storming party could go forward in order, enter the ditch, and begin scaling the scarp to mount the parapet. In short, a good defense required that the defenders lining a parapet or trench be able to deliver a heavy and persistent fire.

During the American Civil War the period in which a field work's defenders were exposed to well aimed hostile fire increased as the distance between opposing entrenched lines became compressed. This occurred either when an attacking force entrenched as it approached the defenders' line prior to an assault or after a repulse when it entrenched rather than continue its retreat to a point well away from the threat of counter attack. As the threat of hostile action became ever more prolonged and persistent the destructive implications of raising above the interior crest to deliver fire became more immediate and needful of a safer alternative. Several alternatives were either known before the war or developed during the war to produce an extra degree of cover above the interior crest that would allow troops to delivered aimed fire without excessive exposure.

Sand-bag loop-holes were formed by placing two sand-bags a few inches apart on the superior slope just above the interior crest with their long ends perpendicular to the direction of the parapet. One or two more Original Image Courtesy Library of Congresssand-bags were placed on top of these with their length running parallel to the direction of the parapet. This created a small opening that was just wide enough and tall enough for a man to insert the muzzle of his musket and still aim and fire it with effect. While the small opening did limit the field of fire, even without an impose limit the general assumption was that fire would be delivered in a direction perpendicular to the line of the interior crest.

As troops became responsible for constructing their own protective works independent of an army's engineering establishment other devices that could be hastily put together using readily available materials were developed to provide cover above the interior crest. Notched or loop-holed timbers were used at the Siege of Vicksburg. These consisted of a long squared timber or raw log with notches or loop-holes cut about half through the thickness of the timber at 3 or 4 foot intervals. The notched side of the timber was laid on the superior slope of a parapet or protective embankment to form a series of small openings that allowed troops Adapted From Miller, PHCW, Vol. 5. P.to rest their muskets on the superior slope and take easy aim at their targets. Like sand-bag loop-holes notched timbers had the advantage of providing both top and side cover so that a bullet would actually have to enter the small notch to take effect. Notches could either be cut straight through the timber or shaped as loop-holes with the interior side several inches wider than the exterior side to give a wider field of fire.

Original Image Courtesy Library of CongressCommon head-logs were a much more attractive alternative for armies in the field that could abandon a hastily fortified position even more quickly than they could occupy it. This type of head cover (sometimes called top-logs) consisted of a large diameter raw log placed on top of blocks or skids a few feet from the interior crest of a parapet or trench embankment. The blocks or skids raised the log high enough for troops to pass their muskets under the log and rest them on the protective Original Image Courtesy Library of Congressearthen embankment to steady their aim. Blocks could be made from raw logs about several feet long and 4 or 5 inches in diameter hewn flat on two sides or from squared timber. Skids were basically small logs cut long enough to extend from the top of a protective embankment to the rear side of a trench, their purpose being to catch the log if it happened to be struck by artillery and send it rolling over the heads of the men in the trench rather than tumbling down on them. In either case, head-logs were usually pinned in place using small pickets driven into the embankment on both sides of the log. Unlike notched timbers, head-logs created a long open slit along the top of the parapet that did not provide side cover for troops firing under them.

If head-logs did not provide as much cover as sand-bag loop-holes or notched timbers, they could be thrown Original Image Courtesy Library of Congressup quickly without an ounce of excess labor. While a good hardwood top-log was preferable, the simple method of construction allowed almost any bullet resistant material of suitable dimensions to be used. One photograph of Confederate rifle trenches at Atlanta shows, for example, rails taken from a nearby railroad used in place of top-logs.

Click Here to Open the Fortification Dictionary Main Term List

January, 2004